ArticleScientific reports2026
Feasibility study on using a detection dog to localize hibernacula of Vipera berus.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The European adder (Vipera berus), classified as critically endangered in Germany, faces severe threats from habitat loss, particularly the decline of primary habitats such as peatlands. Peatland restoration is essential but may pose risks when hibernacula are not considered during rewetting, potentially leading to flooding, site loss, and population declines. Similar risks arise from construction activities in secondary habitats. Protecting these key sites is therefore vital for species conservation but requires reliable methods to locate them. Traditional monitoring approaches, such as visual surveys and telemetry, are often invasive, imprecise, or resource-intensive. This study tested whether a trained adder detection dog could identify adder scent-using sheds and fecal swabs-beneath substrate in controlled line-up experiments and under field conditions. In the line-up tests, we assessed how sample type, burial depth, and substrate influenced detection performance, whereas field searches evaluated detection success under more realistic conditions. In a pilot study, we further examined whether the dog could generalize from collected odor samples to live adders by testing its ability to locate the hibernacula of two previously tagged individuals. In the line-up experiments, the dog identified both sheds and fecal swabs with high sensitivity, performing slightly better with sheds. Detection remained effective at depths of up to 1.2 m, although detection success declined with increasing depth. Under field conditions, the dog reliably detected samples buried at a depth of 50 cm without any false indications. In the pilot study, the dog successfully located hibernating adders, demonstrating that training non-invasively with collected odor samples rather than live animals can be sufficient for this purpose. These findings suggest that detection dogs represent a promising, non-invasive, and efficient tool for locating adder hibernacula. Future studies should include multiple dogs, larger sample sizes, and additional tagged individuals to further validate detection performance under field conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.