SynthesisAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Synergistic Mechanisms and Clinical Efficacy of Combined Shockwave and Ultrasound Therapy for Localized Adiposity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 31 Studies.
Synthesis in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLocalized adiposity remains a significant clinical challenge. Combined shockwave and ultrasound therapy has emerged as a promising non-invasive approach, but its synergistic mechanisms and clinical efficacy require comprehensive evaluation. This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence for this combined therapy, with focus on the novel dual-action axis model.
methodsA comprehensive search (2015-2025) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Thirty-one studies (n = 2,758 participants) were included. Methodological quality was assessed using ROBIS, AMSTAR 2, and RoB 2 tools. Data were synthesized narratively and with meta-analysis where appropriate.
resultsThe dual-action axis model identified mechanical effects (cavitation, Piezo1 activation) and thermal effects (hyperthermia, TRPV4-mediated thermogenesis). Key mechanisms included Piezo1 activation (32 ± 5% increase in adipocyte apoptosis) and TRPV4 stimulation (1.8-fold mitochondrial activity). Meta-analysis showed significant fat reduction across areas: abdomen (2.1 cm, 95% CI 1.7-2.5), thighs (1.8 cm, 1.5-2.1). Combined therapy was superior to cryolipolysis at 6 months (2.3 cm vs 1.5 ± 0.8 cm, p = 0.008) but had higher 12-month recurrence (23% vs 8.7%, p < 0.001). Safety profile was favorable (severe adverse events < 1%).
conclusionCombined therapy achieves synergistic fat reduction through Piezo1/TRPV4 mechanisms. While superior to cryolipolysis short-term, maintenance strategies are needed. This approach represents a paradigm shift in non-invasive body contouring. NO LEVEL ASSIGNED: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each submission to which Evidence-Based Medicine rankings are applicable. This excludes Review Articles, Book Reviews, and manuscripts that concern Basic Science, Animal Studies, Cadaver Studies, and Experimental Studies. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42103962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.