ArticleNeuroradiology2026
Recanalizing distal and small medium vessel occlusions - single-center experience with the new Q catheters.
Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMechanical recanalization of distal and small medium vessel occlusions (DVOs and MeVOs) is technically challenging and likely associated with higher complication rates. Previous studies have shown promising results using Q aspiration catheters in MeVOs. We report our experience with Q catheters in an even more distal cohort of DVOs and small MeVOs, focusing on safety and efficacy.
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed our institutional stroke database for patients with DVOs or MeVOs treated using Q catheters. Baseline characteristics, technical outcomes including modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) score and modified first pass effect (mFPE), as well as clinical outcomes measured by the 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were analyzed. Outcomes were stratified by occlusion type and treatment technique. Periprocedural complications and their clinical impact were systematically assessed.
results57 occlusions in 47 patients were included. Mean age was 75.5 ± 12.7 years. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 7.7 ± 4.6 at admission and 4.9 ± 5.5 at discharge, while the rate of 90-day- mRS ≤ 2 was 37%. 39 were DVOs and 18 small MeVOs. Successful recanalization (mTICI ≥2b) was achieved in 75% overall, with lower rates in DVOs (71%) than MeVOs (83%). Stent retriever-assisted aspiration resulted in higher recanalization rates than aspiration alone (82% vs. 37%). mFPE was achieved in 42%. Periprocedural complications occurred in 9% of cases with no symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) or PH2.
conclusionQ catheters appear to be safe and effective for DVOs and small MeVOs, achieving favorable recanalization rates with an acceptable complication profile. While the study is limited by its small sample size and retrospective design, these findings support the potential of Q catheters as a valuable tool in the treatment of distal and small vessel occlusions. Nevertheless, consistent to the recently published large distal trials, recanalization rates are lower, and complications occur more often in DVOs than in MeVOs, reflecting a different balance between the technical challenges and the smaller expected clinical benefit.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.