Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103918›Full record

ArticleHeredity2026

Minimum marker densities for accurate genomic predictions and heritability estimates in three major North American and European spruce species.

André Soro, Patrick Lenz, Jean Beaulieu, Jean-Philippe Laverdière, Simon Nadeau, France Gagnon, Funda Ogut, Harry X Wu, Martin Perron, Jean Bousquet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

André SoroCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada. dogninema-andre.soro.1@ulaval.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-1694-6234
Patrick LenzCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Jean BeaulieuCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5806-7353
Jean-Philippe LaverdièreNatural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Simon NadeauNatural Resources Canada, Laurentian Forestry Centre, Quebec, QC, Canada.
France GagnonCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Funda OgutNatural Resources Canada, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, NB, Canada.
Harry X WuUmeå Plant Science Centre, Department Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-7072-4704
Martin PerronCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Jean BousquetCanada Research Chair in Forest Genomics, Centre for Forest Research and Institute of Systems and Integrative Biology, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada. jean.bousquet@sbf.ulaval.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genomic selection (GS) is being increasingly used in tree breeding with the aim to accelerate genetic gains by shortening the long breeding cycles. However, high genotyping costs remain a challenge. This study aimed to determine the optimal marker density in genome coverage to maximize GS accuracy and precision of heritability estimates for growth and wood quality traits. Thousands of SNPs representative of the exome of three major spruce species were used: 18,275 SNPs for black spruce (representing 10,894 distinct gene loci), 11,328 SNPs for white spruce (8647 gene loci), and 116,765 SNPs for Norway spruce (20,695 gene loci). For each species, a similar experimental design was used with related full-sib families replicated on two sites, and GBLUP prediction models were developed. The effect of varying the number of SNPs was examined by resampling subsets from 500 to 100,000 SNPs. Results indicated that plateaus in heritability estimates were reached as the marker density increased, stabilizing between 4000 and 8000 SNPs for a spruce genome size of around 2000 centimorgans, a trend consistent across all traits and species. Predictive ability and prediction accuracy both increased with the number of SNPs up to a similar level, beyond which further improvements were marginal. Such minimum marker densities should be financially affordable for most spruce breeding programs, striking a balance between the need for maximizing GS accuracy and that for minimizing genotyping costs. These findings should support the further deployment of GS in conifer breeding programs, with high selection precision and by reducing the financial burden of very high-density SNP coverage, even for conifers characterized by large giga-genomes.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantPiceaEuropeGenetic MarkersGenomicsGenotypeModels, GeneticNorth AmericaPhenotypePlant BreedingPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableSelection, GeneticGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID42103918
PMCPMC13219467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.