Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103897›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2026

Genomic newborn screening: a scoping review of the field's evolution and associated ethical, legal, and social implications.

Gemma L Brown, Loren Walker, Mutiat A Afolabi, Paul A Bain, Ana Bonilha, Bimal P Chaudhari, John Christodoulou, Ziyi Dai, Jan M Friedman, Amy Gaviglio and 9 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Gemma L Brown *Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton, Saffron Walden, UK.
Loren Walker *Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5384-8207
Mutiat A AfolabiLeicester Law School, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-3176-0497
Paul A BainCountway Library, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Ana BonilhaMcGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4821-6308
Bimal P ChaudhariNationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0115-949X
John ChristodoulouMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8431-0641
Ziyi DaiSickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jan M FriedmanUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7482-9570
Amy GaviglioConnetics Consulting, LLC, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Robert C GreenHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8472-0424
Subhashini JaguOffice of Data Sharing, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3888-2390
Bartha M KnoppersCentre of Genomics and Policy, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7004-2722
Ainsley J NewsonSydney Health Ethics Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. ainsley.newson@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3460-772X
Zornitza StarkMurdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8640-1371
Danya F VearsSchool of Medicine, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Aliza WilsonMass General Brigham, Boston, MA, USA.
Yvonne BombardGenomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9516-4539
Anna C F LewisHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1274-386X

Funding

Return of Genomic Results and Estimating Penetrance in Population-Based CohortsR01HL143295 · NHLBI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI CARSON, APRIL P, GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2019 to 2022
$7.2M
Genome Sequence-Based Screening for Childhood Risk and Newborn IllnessU19HD077671 · NICHD · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI BEGGS, ALAN H., GREEN, ROBERT C. · 2013 to 2018
$6.1M
Implementation of Whole Genome Sequencing as Screening in a Diverse Cohort of Healthy InfantsU01TR003201 · NCATS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI GREEN, ROBERT C., HOLM, INGRID ADELE · 2021 to 2024
$5.1M
Long-term Impact and Value of Infant Genomic Sequencing (LIVING)R01HD114807 · NICHD · HARVARD PILGRIM HEALTH CARE, INC. · PI Kurt Derek Christensen · 2024 to 2026
$2.3M
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) R01HD114807U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) U01TR003201U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) U19HD077671U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) R01HL143295U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) 1K99HG012809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of genomic sequencing into newborn screening (genomic newborn screening; gNBS) has the potential to identify more presymptomatic babies who could benefit from early intervention compared to traditional universal newborn screening (NBS). Realizing these benefits requires careful navigation of ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) to minimize harms, promote equity, and maintain trust in NBS programs. The primary objective of this scoping review is to synthesize the ELSI discussed in the gNBS literature, to support implementation and identify knowledge gaps. A secondary objective is to characterize the landscape and contours of the gNBS field. This review, conducted in July 2025, includes academic literature addressing genomic sequencing as a first‑line NBS screen. ELSI were identified within each publication, and these informed the development of a set of decision points with ELSI dimensions within gNBS. A total of 485 publications met inclusion criteria, with the first published in 1987. The volume of publications increased over time, with growing proportions of empirical studies and work associated with gNBS projects, alongside a decreasing proportion of publications from North America. In total, 3781 ELSI considerations were charted using AI-assisted methods, relevant to 59 decision points organized into nine areas. Current scholarship is concentrated on early implementation questions, while long‑term operational needs-such as data stewardship, clinical follow‑up, and sustainable governance-remain underexplored. These gaps, together with limited contributions from many regions due to a multitude of factors, highlight the need for more diverse, empirically grounded, and forward‑looking research to support responsible decisions around gNBS.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.