Trial reportScientific reports2026
A community-based exercise intervention to reduce functional risk factors for injury among stroke survivors in South Korea: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stroke survivors living in the community often experience persistent impairments in muscle strength, balance, mobility, and cardiorespiratory fitness after hospital discharge, which increase vulnerability during daily activities. This pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated the feasibility of a supervised, circuit-based community exercise program and explored its potential effects on functional outcomes related to injury risk. Twenty community-dwelling adults with chronic stroke were randomized to an exercise group (EXG; n = 10) or a control group (CNG; n = 10), and 17 participants (EXG: n = 8; CNG: n = 9) completed the study. The EXG participated in a supervised multicomponent exercise program twice weekly for 8 weeks, while the CNG maintained usual activities. Outcomes included muscle strength, cardiorespiratory endurance, flexibility, balance, respiratory function, and physical performance. Between-group differences were analyzed using analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline values. The intervention showed high adherence with no adverse events. Exploratory analyses indicated improvements in multiple functional domains in the EXG compared with the CNG, although some outcomes did not reach statistical significance after adjustment. These findings support the feasibility and safety of community-based exercise and suggest potential benefits for improving functional risk factors associated with safe mobility after stroke. Larger trials are needed to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.