Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103869›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A two-dimensional cellular automata-based model for urban runoff: a case study of Karaj, Iran.

Sara Torktatari, Mohammad Karimi, Ardalan Izadi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sara TorktatariGIS Department, Geodesy and Geomatics Faculty, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.
Mohammad KarimiGIS Department, Geodesy and Geomatics Faculty, K.N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran. mkarimi@kntu.ac.ir.
Ardalan IzadiFaculty of Civil Engineering, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban runoff poses a significant management challenge due to its potential to damage infrastructure and communities. Accurate runoff modeling is essential for flood mitigation and urban planning. In this study, a Cellular Automata (CA) model was developed to simulate urban runoff. The model uses three transition rules to identify flow-receiving neighbors, distribute flow, and calculate cell flow, considering elevation, precipitation, buildings, and infiltration. Optimal parameters for pixel size, neighborhood configuration, and the flow-direction algorithm were determined. The model was applied to the urban area of Karaj City and validated against FLO-2D. Results show that rasterizing vector data using a 1-m cell size improved RMSE by about 40% compared with a 30-m cell size, while using eight instead of four neighbors improved RMSE by about 27%. Applying the minimization-of-differences algorithm reduced RMSE by about 10% compared with a steepest-direction approach. Moreover, primary streets were the most vulnerable, and impervious land uses generated higher runoff and larger inundated areas than green spaces. Robustness was evaluated through validation under an additional rainfall event, together with sensitivity and uncertainty analyses. The proposed CA model demonstrated good agreement with FLO-2D. Its simplicity and low data requirements make it a practical tool for urban runoff modeling.

Indexed as

Cellular automataFLO-2D modelHydrological modelingUrban surface runoff model

Identifiers

PMID42103869
PMCPMC13342078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.