ArticleScientific reports2026
Interplay between disinfection and the enigmatic diplomonad parasite Spironucleus salmonicida in Atlantic salmon.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diplomonad parasite Spironucleus salmonicida causes spironucleosis, a systemic infection characterised by internal haemorrhaging, splenomegaly, and granulomatous lesions in multiple organs. Prevention is the primary control strategy, particularly in recirculating aquaculture systems (RAS). This study evaluated the effectiveness of common water-disinfection methods against the parasite. In situ experiments assessed parasite survival following exposure to low- and medium-pressure ultraviolet (UV) radiation at different doses. A subsequent in vivo trial simulated a biosecurity breach in RAS using Atlantic salmon smolts. Two loop-disinfection strategies were tested: continuous UV treatment (70-80 mJ/cm²) and ozone (300-350 mV oxidation-reduction potential), alongside a no-disinfection control. The parasite was introduced via make-up water over three days, and fish were monitored for four weeks. In situ, medium‑pressure UV doses ≥ 50 mJ/cm² immediately inactivated the parasite, whereas lower doses achieved inactivation within 48 h. In vivo, no fish developed disease, and the parasite was not detected in any group. Disinfection did not affect mucosal integrity, although ozone increased expression of oxidative stress markers in the gills. UV and ozone also altered microbial community composition. Overall, S. salmonicida was sensitive to medium-pressure UV, and under the tested conditions did not persist or cause disease in RAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.