ArticleScientific reports2026
Assessment of human exposure to terpenes from fragrant plants in homes using passive sampling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The air quality benefits of indoor plants are widely recognized, but their capacity to emit volatile organic compounds (VOCs) such as terpenes remains less explored. This research quantifies the impact of a common fragrant household plant, Plectranthus tomentosa, on indoor terpene levels within residential environments. The emission characteristics of terpenes from potted and hydroculture plants were investigated using PTR-TOF-MS in a controlled chamber, and exposure levels in residential environments were assessed using passive sampler (ePTFE PS). Deploying fragrant plants, particularly hydroculture plants, led to a substantial elevation of indoor terpene concentrations. In 30 homes, hydroculture plants increased average limonene and α-pinene concentrations by 2.3 and 2.5 times, respectively, over 3 h. Our findings demonstrate that fragrant plants, particularly when hydroculture, act as a significant source of limonene and α-pinene. In contrast, the plants exhibited negligible removal efficiency for BTEX compounds. The mean estimated daily exposure dose (DED) for limonene inhalation in infants was 45.4 µg/kg/day, which was significantly higher than that in adults at 13.7 µg/kg/day when deploying hydroculture plants. These results suggest that fragrant plants should be carefully selected and managed, especially in indoor environments where sensitive individuals are present.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.