Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103802›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Quantifying wildfire impacts on atmospheric pollutants using fire exposure metrics and machine-deep learning approaches.

Khushal Das, Sergio Flesca, Claudia Roberta Calidonna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Khushal DasDIMES, University of Calabria, Rende CS, 87036, Italy. khushaldasparmar@gmail.com.
Sergio FlescaDIMES, University of Calabria, Rende CS, 87036, Italy.
Claudia Roberta CalidonnaCNR-ISAC Institute of Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Lamezia Terme, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildfires are increasingly recognised as major contributors to atmospheric pollution, yet their spatial-temporal influence on regional air quality remains insufficiently understood. This study quantifies the impact of wildfire activity on atmospheric gas concentrations by integrating exposure modelling, correlation analysis, and advanced machine learning techniques. Two datasets were employed: (i) continuous atmospheric observations of CO, CO[Formula: see text], CH[Formula: see text], and BC alongside meteorological parameters; and (ii) a wildfire dataset containing fire locations, burned area, and duration. A novel Fire Exposure Index (FEI) was developed to quantify the dynamic likelihood that wildfire plumes influence the observatory, incorporating fire distance, burned area, and wind characteristics. Correlation analyses across distance bands and daily lags (up to six days) revealed clear distance and wind-dependent relationships, with short-term lag effects primarily within one to two days. Baseline machine learning models (Gradient Boosting, Random Forest, Decision Tree) achieved moderate accuracy, while recurrent neural networks (LSTM, GRU, BiLSTM) captured stronger temporal dependencies, particularly for CO[Formula: see text] and CO. A stacked ensemble architecture was subsequently implemented, combining LightGBM, LSTM, GRU, and BiLSTM with a LightGBM meta-learner. The hybrid framework achieved substantial performance improvements within the study domain ([Formula: see text] values ranging from 0.959 to 0.9897 across CO, CH[Formula: see text], and CO[Formula: see text]), demonstrating strong predictive capability under the specific meteorological and geographic conditions examined. The proposed approach demonstrates that integrating exposure metrics with hybrid ensemble learning provides a promising and interpretable strategy for predicting wildfire-induced atmospheric variability and supporting air quality management in fire-prone regions.

Indexed as

Air quality forecastingAtmospheric emissionsCorrelation analysisDeep learningFire exposureMachine learningWildfires

Identifiers

PMID42103802
PMCPMC13347016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.