ArticleScientific reports2026
An improved watershed-based algorithm for ore image segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ore particle size is a critical indicator of ore fragmentation and a key parameter for automated mineral processing. However, traditional ore image segmentation methods suffer from low accuracy, severe under-segmentation, and weak adaptability in complex mining scenarios, while few approaches effectively balance precision and efficiency. To fill this gap, this paper proposes a novel segmentation method that combines an improved distance transform with the watershed algorithm. After image preprocessing, seed regions are optimized using a self-developed local-maximum strategy, and watershed segmentation is further refined with morphological operations. Experimental results on seven test images show that the proposed method achieves a segmentation accuracy of 0.932, an over-segmentation rate of 0.109, and an under-segmentation rate of 0.091, which are significantly better than those of traditional watershed and UNet methods.The proposed method thus exhibits superior performance and stability in practical ore particle analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.