ArticleScientific reports2026
Quantum-inspired NSGA-II for multi-objective optimization of electric vehicle charging stations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing adoption of electric vehicles (EVs) demands reliable and economically viable charging infrastructures that minimize investment risk while ensuring grid stability. Conventional planning approaches often fall short by either overestimating installation needs or underutilizing existing network capacity. This study presents an Entangled Adaptive Hybrid Quantum-Inspired NSGA-II (EAH-QNSGA-II) designed to address these challenges through a multi-objective optimization framework. The method incorporates quantum-inspired representation, entanglement-driven crossover, adaptive quantum rotation, and a localized search mechanism, enabling a balanced exploration–exploitation process and maintaining high-quality Pareto solutions. The proposed framework is evaluated on four benchmark datasets: Palo Alto EV charging records, Boulder public charging usage, the Multi-Faceted EV Charging Transactions dataset, and the IEEE 33-bus distribution system for grid integration. The proposed method aims at minimizing installation cost while simultaneously maximizing service coverage and improving grid load stability in the presence of renewable energy variability. Experimental findings reveal that EAH-QNSGA-II delivers significant gains compared with state-of-the-art approaches. Against classical NSGA-II, the method achieves 34.1% lower installation cost, 30.2% better coverage, and 41.7% stronger grid load balancing. When compared with quantum-inspired PSO, Jaya, EAQGA, and AHQSOA, the proposed method enhances hypervolume by 18–24% and spread by 15–19%, highlighting superior convergence and diversity. These results confirm EAH-QNSGA-II as an efficient and scalable solution framework for future EV charging infrastructure deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.