ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of greenhouse gas emissions from Bonga and Menz sheep breeds managed under community-based breeding program.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Livestock systems contribute substantially to Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, highlighting the need for interventions that enhance productivity while lowering environmental impact. This study assessed GHG emissions and emission intensity (EI) in Ethiopian Menz and Bonga sheep managed under Community-Based Breeding Programs (CBBP) compared with non-CBBP flocks. Using FAO's GLEAM-i model with long-term performance data (2009-2022) and surveys of 321 households, we found that CBBPs reduced total emissions by 14.56% in Menz and 7.04% in Bonga sheep, while protein output rose by 42% and 2%, respectively. EI declined by 21.49% in Menz and 6.29% in Bonga. At the household level, CBBP flocks achieved markedly lower EI, 39.39% in Menz and 30.68% in Bonga, despite higher absolute emissions from larger flocks. Methane, mainly from enteric fermentation, accounted for a higher proportion compared to other GHG gases. EI was positively associated with reproductive inefficiencies while negatively associated with growth traits, underscoring key levers for mitigation. These results demonstrate that CBBPs deliver both productivity gains and environmental co-benefits, offering a scalable model for climate-smart small ruminant development with relevance beyond Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.