Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103762›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2026

Flux sampling and graph neural networks for improved gene essentiality prediction in mammalian genome-scale metabolic models.

Kieren Sharma, Lucia Marucci, Zahraa S Abdallah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kieren SharmaSchool of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. kieren.sharma@bristol.ac.uk.
Lucia Marucci *School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Zahraa S Abdallah *School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

Funding

UK Research and Innovation BB/W013959/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene essentiality, the requirement of a gene for survival or proliferation, is central to understanding cellular processes and identifying drug targets. Experimental determination requires large growth screens that are time-consuming and expensive, motivating in silico approaches. Existing methods predominantly use flux balance analysis (FBA), a constraint-based optimisation framework that requires a predefined cellular objective function. This can introduce observer bias, because the objective often reflects the researcher's assumptions rather than the cell's biological goals. Here, we present FluxGAT, a graph neural network (GNN) that predicts gene essentiality from graphical representations of flux sampling data. Flux sampling removes the need for an explicit objective and instead characterises feasible steady-state fluxes. FluxGAT combines this information with metabolic network topology to learn flux-informed node representations and classify reactions as essential or non-essential. We apply FluxGAT to the iCHO2291 genome-scale model of Chinese hamster ovary cells and Mouse1, a generic mouse model with independent essentiality labels. In both systems, FluxGAT improves sensitivity over FBA while maintaining high precision and specificity, and recovers more experimentally essential genes, especially where FBA predicts very few essentials. These results show that flux-informed GNNs can provide more general gene essentiality predictions across mammalian genome-scale models without hand-crafted objective functions.

Indexed as

Genes, EssentialAlgorithmsAnimalsCHO CellsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationCricetinaeCricetulusGenomeGraph Neural NetworksMammalsMetabolic Flux AnalysisMetabolic Networks and PathwaysMiceModels, Biological

Identifiers

PMID42103762
PMCPMC13369363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.