Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103754›Full record

ArticleNature communications2026

Reactive machine learning potential for accelerating transition state search in organic synthesis.

Kaipai Ren, Kun Tang, Yujing Zhao, Lei Zhang, Jian Du, Qingwei Meng, Qilei Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Kaipai Ren *State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Kun Tang *State Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-5735-9343
Yujing ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Lei ZhangState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7519-2858
Jian DuState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.
Qingwei MengState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1743-2518
Qilei LiuState Key Laboratory of Fine Chemicals, Frontiers Science Center for Smart Materials Oriented Chemical Engineering, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Institute of Chemical Process Systems Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China. liuqilei@dlut.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3879-1827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding reaction kinetics is fundamental to organic synthesis, yet traditional quantum chemistry-based transition state searches are computationally expensive. Here we present DeePEST-OS, a reactive machine learning potential designed for rapid and accurate transition state optimization and energy barrier prediction spanning ten chemical elements. Trained on approximately 75,000 reactions generated by a low-cost data preparation strategy, this model integrates physical priors from semi-empirical quantum chemistry with equivariant message passing networks to predict potential energy surfaces nearly 10,000 times faster than quantum chemistry methods, while achieving high accuracy for transition state geometry (averaged root mean square deviation of 0.12 Å) and energy barriers (mean absolute error of 0.60 kcal/mol) on unseen reactions. DeePEST-OS enables practical applications including transition state conformer screening, barrier prediction for retrosynthesis of complex pharmaceuticals, and experimentally validated diastereoselectivity prediction in Diels-Alder reactions. Collectively, these results establish DeePEST-OS as a powerful tool for accelerating reaction kinetics studies in multi-element organic synthesis.

Identifiers

PMID42103754
PMCPMC13376211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.