ArticleNature communications2026
CroCoDeEL: accurate control-free detection of cross-sample contamination in metagenomic data.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing plant protein sources in the diet modulates gut microbiota and tryptophan metabolism in men at cardiometabolic risk.Gut microbes · 2026Trial
- Species and strain sharing in the vaginal microbiome of mothers and their adult daughters.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Decoding the cancer microbiome: multi-omics, AI, and translational opportunities.Genome biology · 2026Review
- Microbiome signature of Parkinson's disease in healthy and genetically at-risk individuals.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides modulate gut microbiota composition and metabolism: dose-response assessment in anGut microbes reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metagenomic sequencing provides insights into microbial communities, but it can be compromised by technical biases, including cross-sample contamination. This phenomenon arises when microbial content is inadvertently exchanged among concurrently processed samples, distorting microbial profiles and compromising the reliability of metagenomic data and downstream analyses. Existing detection methods rely on negative controls, which are insufficiently used and do not detect cross-contamination within non-control samples. Meanwhile, strain-level bioinformatics approaches do not distinguish contamination from natural strain sharing and lack sensitivity. To fill this gap, we introduce CroCoDeEL, a decision-support tool for detecting and quantifying cross-sample contamination. Leveraging linear modeling and a pre-trained supervised model, CroCoDeEL identifies specific contamination patterns in species abundance profiles. It requires no negative controls or prior knowledge of sample processing positions, offering improved accuracy and versatility. Benchmarks across three public datasets demonstrate that CroCoDeEL can detect contaminated samples and identify their contamination sources, even at low rates (<0.1%), provided sufficient sequencing depth. Application of CroCoDeEL to several existing studies reveals previously undetected contamination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.