Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42103384›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2026

Lithium versus lamotrigine in bipolar disorder type II: protocol for a single-blinded, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial (the LiLa-Bipolar RCT).

Mette Ungermann Fredskild, Caroline Fussing Fussing Bruun, Kamilla Woznica Miskowiak, Esben Budtz-Jørgensen, Maj Vinberg, Maria Faurholt-Jepsen, Lars Vedel Kessing

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06184581 (Lithium Versus Lamotrigine in Bipolar Disorder, Type II - a Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06184581 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Lithium Versus Lamotrigine in Bipolar Disorder, Type II - a Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial (the LiLa-Bipolar RCT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital Bispebjerg and FrederiksbergRan2024 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsBipolar II DisorderArmsLithium Carbonate, Lamotrigine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mette Ungermann FredskildCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark mette.ungermann.fredskild@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4653-3278
Caroline Fussing Fussing BruunCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9401-358X
Kamilla Woznica MiskowiakDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Esben Budtz-JørgensenSection of Biostatistics, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maj VinbergDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maria Faurholt-JepsenCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0462-6444
Lars Vedel KessingCopenhagen Affective Disorder Research Centre (CADIC), Copenhagen University Hospital, Mental Health Services CPH, Psychiatric Center Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9377-9436

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionBipolar II disorder (BDII) accounts for the majority of patients with bipolar disorder (BD), yet evidence supporting first-line mood stabilising treatment with lithium and lamotrigine is scarce, and the certainty of the evidence is very low. This highlights a critical evidence gap within psychiatric care. The lithium versus lamotrigine-bipolar randomised controlled trial (RCT) aims to compare lithium and lamotrigine on self-rated day-to-day mood instability (MI) and other patient-centred outcomes in BDII, hypothesising the superiority of lithium. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A two-arm, single-blind, parallel-group, superiority RCT with a target sample size of 200 patients (accounting for attrition), recruiting patients with newly diagnosed BDII from specialised outpatient mood disorder clinics in the capital region of Copenhagen, Denmark. Participants are randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either lithium or lamotrigine for 6 months. The primary outcome is MI, assessed via daily smartphone-based mood ratings. MI is chosen as the primary outcome measure due to its internal validity as a real-life measure for patients and external validity as it reflects both illness severity and functional impairment. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of participants showing a non-response to treatment and observer-rated changes in depressive symptoms over 6 months, measured using the six-item version of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale. Primary analyses will follow the intention-to-treat principle using linear mixed models. The trial is monitored by the good clinical practice.Recruitment commenced on 8 May 2024, and the final participant follow-up (last patient last visit) is expected on 1 December 2027. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has received approvals from the Danish Research Ethics Committee, the Danish Medicines Agency (EU CT No. 2023-5 09 607-32-00) and the Capital Region Data Agency (P-2023-307). Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Clinicaltrials.gov/NCT06184581.

Indexed as

Antimanic AgentsBipolar DisorderLamotrigineLithiumLithium CompoundsDenmarkEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodTreatment OutcomeAntimanic AgentsLamotrigineLithiumLithium CompoundsAdult psychiatryBipolar and Related DisordersClinical Trial

Identifiers

PMID42103384
PMCPMC13157741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.