ArticleBMJ open2026
Model of care to promote recovery in older people with long COVID: findings from interviews and a co-design workshop.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aimed to co-design a tailored model of care for older people with long COVID.
designUsing a human-centred design approach, semistructured interviews were conducted with patients and health professionals from a long COVID service to explore their experiences. Insights were further developed during a co-design workshop involving patients, health professionals and community members who identified as older people and who had experience with chronic illness. Key themes were identified and used to map an ideal patient journey and inform the final model of care.
settingLong COVID outpatient service in a tertiary hospital in Adelaide, South Australia.
participantsFour patients and four health professionals participated in the interviews. The workshop included four patients, five health professionals and seven community members.
resultsThe co-design process identified challenges experienced by people with long COVID, including lack of validation, delayed multidisciplinary care, mental health deterioration and difficulties navigating the healthcare system. These challenges were described as having particular relevance for older adults. In response, a model of care was developed focused on comprehensive assessment, coordinated multidisciplinary care, education for self-management, mental health support and opportunities for research participation.
conclusionsA comprehensive and adaptable model of care is needed to address the complex and multifaceted nature of long COVID. This human-centred design approach ensured the model was grounded in lived experience, clinically informed and aligned with patient priorities. While not unique to older adults, the findings highlight areas that may require particular attention in this population, including care coordination, validation and support for comorbidities and social vulnerabilities. While developed in a single tertiary service, these principles may inform the design of services for similar populations in other healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.