ArticleBMJ open2026
Socioeconomic disparities and mortality among acute patients with sepsis: a retrospective Danish cohort study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesSocioeconomic inequalities exist in infectious diseases and sepsis in high-income countries. We investigated the association between income and mortality among patients with sepsis, overall and among those treated in the intensive care unit (ICU) versus general wards.
designA retrospective register-based cohort study.
settingThe Region of Southern Denmark (RSD).
participantsAll adult patients with an unplanned contact with a hospital in the RSD from 1 January 2016 to 20 March 2018. Patients with sepsis were identified based on the following criteria: (1) blood culture(s) performed within 48 hours of arrival, (2) antibiotic(s) administered within 48 hours of arrival, (3) a discharge diagnosis of infection and (4) a SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment) score of ≥2. The cohort was divided into quartiles according to household income. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the association between income groups and mortality. The primary outcome was 90-day mortality with 7-day and 365-day mortality as secondary outcomes. All outcomes were calculated overall and stratified by general ward treatment only and ICU admission.
resultsWe identified 7813 first-time visits with community-acquired sepsis, including 886 ICU admissions (11.3%). Among patients in the lowest income group, sepsis was associated with a HR of 1.16 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.34) for 90-day mortality compared with the highest income group. This association was particularly pronounced at 365-day follow-up: HR=1.24 (95% CI 1.10 to 1.39). No difference was observed in 7-day all-cause mortality, HR=1.13 (95% CI 0.89 to 1.45). The association was not observed among patients admitted to the ICU.
conclusionLow income was associated with increased mortality in patients with sepsis, particularly during long-term follow-up. The impact of income disparities was not observed among patient admitted to the ICU.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.