ArticleBMJ open2026
Healthcare utilisation patterns among frail individuals aged 50+ years: results from the Lolland-Falster Population Study (LOFUS).
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesFrailty is a clinical syndrome characterised by impaired homeostatic mechanisms and reduced physiological reserve. Hospital admissions for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) are commonly used as indicators of quality in primary healthcare. We aimed to examine the association between frailty and the use of healthcare resources, including unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs and visits to general practitioners (GPs) and medical specialists (MSs) in primary care. We hypothesised that frail individuals would have similar odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs.
designRegistry-based epidemiological study.
settingData from the Danish Lolland-Falster Health Study and national health registers. Data were collected in a rural region of Denmark between February 2016 and February 2020.
participants10 154 randomly selected individuals aged ≥50 years participating in the Lolland-Falster Health Study with valid frailty measurements. OUTCOME MEASURES: Hospital visits due to any diagnosis, hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs, and visits to GPs and MSs in the primary care sector.
resultsAfter adjustment for age, sex, comorbidity and socioeconomic factors, frail participants had higher odds of hospital visits due to any diagnosis (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.57; p=0.03). The odds of hospital visits due to ACSCs (OR 1.42, 95% CI 0.97 to 2.08; p=0.07) and non-ACSCs (OR 1.16, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.47; p=0.22) were not significantly different. Frail individuals had higher odds of visiting their GP (OR 1.21, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.46; p=0.047) but not a medical specialist (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.07; p=0.15).
conclusionsAmong frail individuals, the distinction between unplanned hospital visits due to ACSCs and non-ACSCs is not meaningful. This finding is consistent with the understanding of frailty as a state of reduced physiological reserve, in which minor stressors may lead to hospital care regardless of diagnostic category.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.