ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026
Prognostic biomarkers for lung adenocarcinoma based on Mendelian randomization analysis.
Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BackgroundLung adenocarcinoma is a multifaceted disease with diverse locations and timings of gene mutations, histology, and molecular pathogenesis. Thus, identifying therapeutic target genes for lung adenocarcinoma has become a major challenge.MethodWe downloaded the gene expression profiles of 220 patients with lung adenocarcinoma from the Gene Expression Omnibus database and identified the differentially expressed genes between noncancer tissue and cancer tissue groups. Mendelian randomization analysis was performed using the exposure gene expression quantitative trait locus dataset and outcome dataset (ieu-a-965) to obtain genome-wide association studies summary data. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the presence of pleiotropy and heterogeneity in the instrumental variables. Additionally, we performed Mendelian randomization analysis to explore the potential intersecting genes between differentially expressed and specific genes. Moreover, gene set enrichment and overall survival analyses were performed on the intersection gene.ResultsWe combined Gene Expression Omnibus and genome-wide association studies data to identify one upregulated and two downregulated genes associated with lung adenocarcinoma risk using inverse variance weight analysis as the primary analytical method. We observed that survival was significantly higher in the groups with high expressions of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.