ArticleFamily medicine2026
An Innovative Model of Delivering Resident Didactics in Two Family Medicine Residency Programs.
Article in Family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesDidactic training in residency is crucial for competency development. While traditional noon conferences (NCs) are common, challenges exist. The academic half-day (AHD) model has emerged as a promising alternative, showing improved resident engagement and learning outcomes. A hybrid model that blends NCs with AHDs may improve resident learning while minimizing productivity and administrative challenges.
methodsA 6-month project was implemented and evaluated during the 2023-2024 academic year. The project comprised 3 weeks of traditional NC didactics and 1 week of AHD each month. We assessed didactic quality, resident satisfaction, and attendance, including data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) surveys. Statistical analyses included paired-samples t tests. All tests were two-sided with α set at 0.05. We also analyzed effect sizes.
resultsResident attendance increased from 60.07%-65.96% overall, with AHD attendance reaching 97.5%. Survey responses indicated significant improvements in engagement (mean 2.46 to 4.46; P<0.001), in-depth learning (mean 2.39 to 4.46; P<0.001), work-life balance (mean 1.77 to 4.23; P<0.001), and wellness (mean 1.92 to 4.39; P<0.001). Preferences varied, with 60% of residents favoring weekly AHDs. ACGME surveys showed that compliance for educational balance and protected time increased from 67%-76% and 47%-71%, respectively.
conclusionsTransitioning to a hybrid AHD model was associated with improved resident engagement, satisfaction, attendance, and educational value compared to the traditional NC model. Continued evaluation is recommended to optimize educational outcomes and resource utilization, while minimizing challenges to productivity and administrative details.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.