Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102874›Full record

ArticleFamily medicine2026

Training Needs for Rural Primary Care Practice: A Scoping Review of Resident Physician Preparation.

David F Schmitz, Annie Koempel, Campbell Cook, Andrew W Bazemore

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David F SchmitzDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND.
Annie KoempelAmerican Board of Family Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Campbell CookCollege of Medicine, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Andrew W BazemoreCenter for Professionalism and Value in Health Care, American Board of Family Medicine, Washington, DC.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSome graduate medical education programs focus on the preparation of physicians for rural primary care practice. More exploration is needed to understand what is taught and how medical educators prepare resident and fellow physicians for rural practice. The purpose of this scoping review was to identify the primary dimensions of the concept of graduate medical education competencies for rural practice settings and describe the related evidence and gaps in the literature.

methodsIn 2024, we used a modified PRISMA-ScR approach to identify studies that addressed the unique training needs and competencies of residents intending practice in a rural area of the United States. For our study, we gathered peer-reviewed materials from a 10 year period (2013-2023) using PubMed as our data source.

resultsA total of 423 articles were identified. We screened abstracts and manuscripts, and included 22 articles. Eleven articles (50%) described training in preparation for rural practice, including two concerning fellowship-level graduate medical education. Five (23%) articles described residency or fellowship training occurring in rural areas. Six (27%) articles described studies involving focused training occurring in rural versus nonrural locations.

conclusionsLimited literature exists to systematically define the graduate medical education competencies required for eventual rural practice. This gap necessitates a clearer framework for training and preparing physicians for these settings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducation, Medical, GraduateInternship and ResidencyPrimary Health CareRural Health ServicesHumansUnited States

Identifiers

PMID42102874
PMCPMC12977938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.