ArticleFamily medicine2026
Narrative Methodology to Examine Medical Students' Experiences of Adverse Events.
Article in Family medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesClinically significant adverse events (CSAEs; eg, the death of a patient or a medical error) affect clinicians at all levels and can include stress, guilt, and doubt about abilities. The medical student experience may be different and could impact professional identity formation. We describe the use of narrative methodology as a research tool to understand complex life events and explore important themes in medical education.
methodsKey aspects of narrative methodology are described using an example of a research study that explored medical student experiences following a CSAE. We describe what constitutes narrative methodology, how narrative methodology is situated within a constructivist worldview, approaches for collecting and analyzing narrative data, metrics of research quality, and potential limitations to this methodology. Specifically, within the example case, we demonstrate how to use a holistic analytic lens and integrate themes across multiple stories.
resultsUsing narrative analysis is an important methodology that medical educators can use to explore deeply complex stories. Use of a holistic analytic lens allows for comparison across multiple stories and helps understand students' experiences as well as their impact on professional identity formation.
conclusionsIncorporating narrative analysis into the medical education researcher's toolbox has the potential to benefit participants and health systems by formulating answers to difficult questions, and improving education and student support through centering the stories of individual participants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.