Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102781›Full record

ArticleESMO open2026

First-in-human study of the dual A

L L Siu, M E Gutierrez, L Pudelko, K Ruth, M A F N Filho, R Zaynagetdinov, P Hu, T Kitzing, B K Guenhan, I Durutovic and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in ESMO open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05198349 (First-in-Human Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Clinical Activity of M1069 in Participants With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Solid Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05198349 phase1terminatednot on this map

First-in-Human Study to Investigate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Clinical Activity of M1069 in Participants With Metastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Solid Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorEMD Serono Research & Development Institute, Inc.Ran2022 to 2023Enrolled15ConditionsMetastatic or Locally Advanced Unresectable Solid TumorsArmsM1069
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

L L SiuPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: lillian.siu@uhn.ca.
M E GutierrezHackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, USA.
L PudelkoMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
K RuthMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
M A F N FilhoMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
R ZaynagetdinovEMD Serono Research & Development Institute Inc, Billerica, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA.
P HuEMD Serono Research & Development Institute Inc, Billerica, USA, an affiliate of Merck KGaA.
T KitzingMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
B K GuenhanMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
I DurutovicMerck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
M McKeanSarah Cannon Research Institute (SCRI), Nashville, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdenosine is a key driver of an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Elevated extracellular adenosine levels in the tumor microenvironment contribute to therapeutic resistance via A PATIENTS AND

methodsThis phase I, open-label, first-in-human study (NCT05198349) evaluated muvadenant in adult patients with advanced solid malignancies (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1). Primary objectives were determination of maximum tolerated dose and recommended dose for expansion of muvadenant. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and early signs of efficacy.

resultsOverall, 15 patients were evaluated across four dose levels (DLs) of muvadenant monotherapy provided twice daily (bd): 150 mg (n = 3), 300 mg (n = 3), 450 mg (n = 6), and 600 mg (n = 3). Dose-limiting toxicities were reported in two patients [grade 4 blood creatinine phosphokinase increased (450-mg DL, n = 1) and grade 3 lipase increased (600-mg DL, n = 1)]. Fatigue and nausea were the most common adverse events (n = 5 each, 33.3% each), while nausea was the most common muvadenant-related adverse event (n = 4, 26.7%). Two deaths were reported, both attributed to disease progression >30 days after treatment end. Best overall response of stable disease was recorded in three patients, including one patient with a stable disease of 12.6 months at the 150-mg DL. Median progression-free survival was 1.3 months (95% confidence interval 1.2-2.6). The potential recommended dose for expansion was 450-mg bd, and the maximum tolerated dose was not established due to early closure of the study.

conclusionsMuvadenant was generally well tolerated; however, no antitumor activity was observed. A potential dose-response could not be determined due to limited number of patients per DL.

Indexed as

Adenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMaximum Tolerated DoseMiddle AgedReceptor, Adenosine A2AReceptor, Adenosine A2BAdenosine A2 Receptor AntagonistsAntineoplastic AgentsReceptor, Adenosine A2AReceptor, Adenosine A2Badvanced solid tumorsdual A(2)(A)/A(2)(B) adenosine receptor antagonistfirst-in-humanmuvadenant (M1069)pharmacokineticssafety

Identifiers

PMID42102781
PMCPMC13185761

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.