Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102280›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026

The Actionable Innovation Day Approach: Participatory Model for Advancing Critical Care Innovation.

Brett N Hryciw, Cecilia Tran, Rashi Ramchandani, Cameron Love, Christine Caron, Aimee Sarti, Annelise Miller, Suzanne Madore, Michael Chasse, Andy Pan and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Brett N HryciwDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4261-0208
Cecilia TranDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Rashi RamchandaniDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6144-6423
Cameron LoveDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christine CaronDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Aimee SartiDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Annelise MillerDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Suzanne MadoreDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Michael ChasseDepartment of Intensive Care, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada.
Andy PanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4484-9136
Simon DidcoteOBS Medical (United Kingdom), Gloucestershire, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-6704-7984
Scott MillingtonDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Heather GalleyDepartment of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6326-9675
Kwadwo KyeremantengDepartment of Critical Care, Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Andrew SeelyClinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, 451 Smyth Road, Ottawa, ON, K1H 8M5, Canada, 1 (613) 562-5800.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6459-8801

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Health care innovation is essential for improving patient outcomes, enhancing system efficiency, and preparing for future challenges; however, meaningful progress is often hindered by entrenched barriers such as resistance to change, fragmented interdisciplinary collaboration, and constrained financial and human resources. These persistent obstacles make it difficult for health care systems to translate creative ideas into sustainable, real-world improvements, underscoring the need for structured approaches that support collaboration and reduce implementation friction. To address these challenges, we developed the Actionable Innovation Day (AID) approach, a structured, participatory model designed to generate consensus-based, low-cost recommendations that are feasible for system improvement. The first regional AID event in Eastern Ontario gathered 57 multidisciplinary participants, including clinicians, administrators, patient partners, and industry leaders, for a full-day series of presentations, facilitated discussions, and targeted breakout sessions focused on critical care. Through guided deliberation and collaborative analysis, participants synthesized diverse perspectives into a prioritized set of improvement opportunities. The process yielded 28 actionable recommendations across 4 domains: health care innovation, regionalized care, critical care practices, and the use of artificial intelligence. A postevent survey (86% response rate) showed strong agreement, with 23 recommendations rated above 4 on a 5-point scale. The highest-ranked proposals emphasized the value of strengthening research-industry-clinical partnerships, integrating families more intentionally into intensive care unit rehabilitation and recovery processes, and implementing centralized regional coordination to optimize critical care capacity. Together, these findings illustrate not only the feasibility of the AID model but also the AID model's ability to surface strategic, context-appropriate solutions that resonate across stakeholder groups. The AID process offers a scalable and adaptable template for advancing health care innovation through collaborative, real-world problem-solving. While this initial event focused on critical care, the underlying principles of structured engagement, iterative consensus building, and interdisciplinary co-design are broadly applicable to many sectors of health care. We encourage institutions, regional networks, and health system leaders to adopt and tailor the AID framework to their own local priorities, recognizing that inclusive innovation processes can accelerate system improvement even in resource-limited settings. Ultimately, the AID approach serves as both a methodology and a call to action: by empowering teams to collectively identify, refine, and champion actionable ideas, health care organizations can build the capacity and culture necessary to drive meaningful and sustained innovation across diverse clinical and operational domains.

Indexed as

Critical CareDiffusion of InnovationOrganizational InnovationArtificial IntelligenceHumansOntarioAIartificial intelligencecritical careinnovationinterdisciplinary collaborationpatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID42102280
PMCPMC13155498

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.