Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102191›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.

Wanru Li, Jia Yang, Pinglei Bao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Wanru LiSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0009-0005-2136-6890
Jia YangSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6733-0029
Pinglei BaoSchool of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6643-2904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual system balances veridical object perception with flexible visual working memory (VWM), both engaging high-level visual regions. However, how these competing demands shape object-selective cortex (OSC) representations remains unclear. Here, we ask whether VWM inherits the spatial constraints observed in the OSC during perception or reorganizes representations to meet mnemonic demands. Using a matched task design and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based decoding, we systematically compared the localization of object-identity representations during perception and VWM. A robust dissociation emerged: Perception kept object information largely contralateral, whereas VWM produced robust ipsilateral representation even when memorizing bilateral items. These expanded representations exploited more than 90% of ipsilateral OSC vertices and could not be attributed to increased attentional span. Critically, the ipsilateral representations closely mirrored contralateral representations, implicating interhemispheric coordination in VWM. Together, these findings demonstrate that object VWM flexibly recruits distributed high-level visual cortex, with spatial reorganization distinguishing mnemonic flexibility from perceptual fidelity.

Indexed as

Memory, Short-TermVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42102191
PMCPMC13155342

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.