ArticleScience advances2026
Spatial reorganization of object representations in high-level visual cortex distinguishes working memory from perception.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The visual system balances veridical object perception with flexible visual working memory (VWM), both engaging high-level visual regions. However, how these competing demands shape object-selective cortex (OSC) representations remains unclear. Here, we ask whether VWM inherits the spatial constraints observed in the OSC during perception or reorganizes representations to meet mnemonic demands. Using a matched task design and functional magnetic resonance imaging-based decoding, we systematically compared the localization of object-identity representations during perception and VWM. A robust dissociation emerged: Perception kept object information largely contralateral, whereas VWM produced robust ipsilateral representation even when memorizing bilateral items. These expanded representations exploited more than 90% of ipsilateral OSC vertices and could not be attributed to increased attentional span. Critically, the ipsilateral representations closely mirrored contralateral representations, implicating interhemispheric coordination in VWM. Together, these findings demonstrate that object VWM flexibly recruits distributed high-level visual cortex, with spatial reorganization distinguishing mnemonic flexibility from perceptual fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.