Trial reportBrain and behavior2026
The Impact of BWM-T Versus Brief Mindfulness Induction on Stress, Anxiety and Self-Efficacy in University Students: Immediate and Short-Term Outcomes of RCT on Psychological Well-Being and Autonomic Balance.
Trial report in Brain and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversity students face increasing levels of stress, anxiety, and self-efficacy, which may disrupt autonomic balance. While many mind-body interventions require sustained practice, growing evidence suggests that even a single session can yield immediate benefits. This randomized controlled trial compared the immediate and short-term effects of the brain wave modulation technique (BWM-T) and a brief mindfulness induction on psychological and physiological outcomes in university students.
methods68 students were randomly assigned to either BWM-T or a brief mindfulness induction. State anxiety (STAI-Y1), psychological distress (distress thermometer), generalized self-efficacy scale (GSES), and 5 min heart rate variability (HRV) indices were assessed at baseline (T0), immediately after the session (T1), and 4 h later (T2). Mixed-design ANOVAs with Time (T0, T1, T2) as a within-subject factor and group (BWM-T vs. brief mindfulness induction) as a between-subject factor were conducted, followed by paired-sample t-tests where appropriate.
resultsAcross the total sample, significant main effects of Time emerged for state anxiety, distress, and self-efficacy (ps < 0.001), indicating reductions in anxiety and distress and increases in self-efficacy from pre-to post-session that were largely maintained at the 4 h follow-up. No significant time × group interactions were found for psychological outcomes, suggesting comparable trajectories for BWM-T and mindfulness. For HRV indices, a significant time × group interaction was observed only for VLF power. VLF decreased from T0-T1 in the BWM-T group, whereas no systematic changes were detected in the mindfulness group. All other HRV parameters (SDNN, rMSSD, pNN50, LF, HF, LF/HF) remained stable over time, with no differential group effects.
conclusionsA single 16 min session of either BWM-T or a brief mindfulness induction yielded rapid improvements in self-reported anxiety, distress and GSES in university students, with effects persisting up to 4 h. Physiological effects were limited to a short-lived reduction in VLF power following BWM-T, while other indices of vagally mediated HRV did not change significantly. These findings support the use of brief mind-body practices as feasible tools for acute stress regulation in academic settings, while underscoring the need for larger, adequately powered trials and more comprehensive autonomic assessments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.