ArticlePLoS pathogens2026
SPRY domains encode ubiquitin ligase specificity for ZAP and RIG-I.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Innate immune sensors rely on ubiquitin ligases to calibrate antiviral responses, yet the rules governing substrate recognition by SPRY-containing ligases remain poorly defined. Here, we establish a large-scale structure-based screening pipeline using AlphaFold to systematically predict interactions between human nucleic acid sensors and SPRY-containing proteins. Our approach uncovered novel transient or degradation-sensitive interactions that are typically missed by proteomic methods, including a labile TRIM58-OAS1 complex. We show that SPRY domains dictate substrate specificity: TRIM25 preferentially engages ZAP, whereas Riplet favors RIG-I. Domain-swapping experiments demonstrated that SPRY domains are sufficient to reprogram ligase specificity and antiviral activity. Phylogenetic and structural analyses revealed that TRIM25 and Riplet evolved from a common ancestor but diverged in coiled-coil architecture and oligomeric state, while retaining conserved substrate preferences. Residue-level modeling identified hypervariable SPRY loops as critical determinants of recognition, a prediction validated by targeted mutagenesis of the TRIM25-ZAP interface. Finally, we show that distinct SPRY-containing ligases surveil self-amplifying RNA (saRNA) vaccines: Riplet-RIG-I primarily responds when RNA is delivered by lipofection, whereas TRIM25-ZAP is engaged upon lipid nanoparticle delivery, with functional consequences for vaccine expression. Together, these findings demonstrate that SPRY domains encode recognition logic for ubiquitin ligases, that AlphaFold enables discovery of otherwise hidden interactions and that these principles have direct implications for RNA-based therapeutics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.