Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102111›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Evaluation of an automated reader for disc diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing in a routine microbiology laboratory.

Patricia Orlandi Barth, Xander Cortez Pinzas, Vitória Torrescasana Teixeira, Larissa Lutz, Caroline Collioni Constante, Bruno Rodriguez Tondin, André Frotta Müller, Danton Pereira da Silva Junior, Paulo Roberto Stefani Sanches, Afonso Luís Barth

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Patricia Orlandi BarthLaboratório de Pesquisa em Resistência Antimicrobiana (LABRESIS) - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0763-1430
Xander Cortez PinzasServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Vitória Torrescasana TeixeiraServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Larissa LutzServiço de Diagnóstico Laboratorial - Unidade de Microbiologia - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8834-0194
Caroline Collioni ConstanteServiço de Diagnóstico Laboratorial - Unidade de Microbiologia - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Bruno Rodriguez TondinServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6263-2685
André Frotta MüllerServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Danton Pereira da Silva JuniorServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Paulo Roberto Stefani SanchesServiço de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Engenharia Biomédica - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.
Afonso Luís BarthLaboratório de Pesquisa em Resistência Antimicrobiana (LABRESIS) - Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is essential for determining the in vitro activity of antimicrobial agents against specific microorganisms. Reliable data from AST is needed for the detection of resistance mechanisms which are crucial to ensure appropriate treatment of patients in healthcare settings or in the community. Automated AST readers of the inhibition zone provide valuable tools for standardizing the testing process in microbiology laboratories, enabling faster and more reliable interpretation of results. The aim of this study was to evaluate AntibiHórus, an in-house developed automated disc diffusion AST reader, by comparing its performance against manual reading of the inhibition zones using a ruler. A total of 500 ASTs, including both Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, were evaluated using 22 different antimicrobial discs, resulting in 4,709 inhibition zone measurements. Manual readings with a ruler were compared with the automated readings from AntibiHórus. The overall categorical agreement (CA) between AntibiHórus and manual reading was 96.86%, with minimal error rates, 2.08% for Very Major Errors (VME), 0.30% for Major Errors (ME), and 0.76% for Minor Errors (MiE). Statistical analysis showed a strong correlation between methods (Pearson correlation coefficient R ≥ .95). The findings demonstrate that AntibiHórus is a reliable tool for routine microbiology laboratory work, enhancing the efficiency, standardization, and accuracy of AST analysis by automating inhibition zone measurement and interpretation.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDisk Diffusion Antimicrobial TestsAutomationGram-Negative BacteriaGram-Positive BacteriaHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID42102111
PMCPMC13155602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.