Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102056›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Psychometric evaluation of the ethical caring competency scale among Iranian Nurses: A methodological study.

Yasin Jafari Rahim Abad, Kiyana Saadati, Fatemeh Ghaffari

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yasin Jafari Rahim AbadStudent Research Committee, Nursing Care Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7765-8941
Kiyana SaadatiStudent Research Committee, Ramsar Campus, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Ramsar, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2299-6016
Fatemeh GhaffariNursing Care Research Center, Health Research Institute, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-1579

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNurses face complex ethical challenges across diverse healthcare settings, making ethical caring competency essential to professional practice. Given that Iranian nurses encounter ethically sensitive situations shaped by sociocultural and religious values and that no validated tool exists to assess this construct the aim of this study was to culturally adapt and psychometrically validate the Ethical Caring Competency Scale (ECCS) for use among Iranian nurses.

methodsThis methodological, cross‑sectional study included 697 registered nurses who were recruited through convenience sampling from seven teaching hospitals affiliated with Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Iran. Data were collected in person by the researcher through visits to hospital wards, during which nurses completed the instruments at the end of their work shifts. The Ethical Caring Competency Scale (ECCS; 22 items across four dimensions) was culturally adapted for the Iranian context following World Health Organization (WHO) translation protocols, including forward-back translation, expert panel review, and pilot testing with 20 nurses. Construct validity was evaluated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), Exploratory Graph Analysis (EGA), and the Random Forest Model (RFM). In addition, internal consistency reliability and measurement invariance across gender were examined.

resultsAll 697 nurses fully completed the data collection instruments. Participants had a mean age of 35.17 ± 8.41 years and 10.55 ± 7.24 years of work experience; most were female (80.6%) and held a bachelor's degree (89.4%). EFA identified a four‑factor structure that explained 52.80% of the total variance. CFA results confirmed an adequate model fit, with all fit indices (PCFI = 0.737, PNFI = 0.713, CMIN/DF = 2.76, RMSEA = 0.071, IFI = 0.934, CFI = 0.933, and GFI = 0.918) meeting acceptable criteria. EGA results also reproduced the four-factor structure in 99.4% of bootstrap samples. Convergent validity (AVE > 0.5) and divergent validity (√AVE > inter-construct correlations) were confirmed. All reliability coefficients were above 0.7. The RFM demonstrated that the component 'Acting while thinking about how to provide better care' was the most significant factor (contributing 37.56%) in predicting the total ethical caring competency score. The measurement invariance test indicated that the factor structure was stable across genders.

conclusionsThe Persian version of the ECCS demonstrated acceptable psychometric properties, a stable conceptual structure, cultural sensitivity, and good discriminant validity for the components of ethical caring competency. Therefore, it can be considered a valid and reliable instrument for assessing the ethical caring competency of nurses in Iran.

Indexed as

EmpathyNursesPsychometricsAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansIranMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42102056
PMCPMC13155570

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.