ArticlePloS one2026
Hybrid Bacterial Colony Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization for load balancing in fog computing.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fog computing minimizes latency and bandwidth consumption by processing data near the source, but it has the challenge of workload balancing across the dynamic and resource limited fog nodes. Uneven task assignment can result in bottlenecks, idle resources, and lowered Quality of Service (QoS) standards. In this work, we introduce a hybrid metaheuristic load balancing algorithm for fog computing by combining the Bacterial Colony Optimization (BCO) and the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) techniques to enhance load balancing. BCO has good solution space exploration capabilities, whereas PSO has the advantage of quick convergence; the hybrid takes advantage from both to achieve reduced makespan with better VM usage. The proposed algorithm has been developed in the Python language, with original BCO and hybrid modules, along with a standard PSO executable. The program has been tested on a synthetic offline task-VM dataset generated by CloudSim 6.0 with size ranges from 100 to 10,000 tasks and poison distribution of variety of tasks arriving, with identical experiment settings. The results indicate the hybrid BCO-PSO to exhibit significant makespan reduction with increased VM utilization compared to the individual BCO, PSO, as well as the Adaptive Inertia Weight Particle Swarm Optimization (AIW-PSO) algorithms for most test scenarios, with faster convergence for high workload scenarios. In the high-load cases, the hybrid reduced makespan by 32.76% compared to AIW-PSO for 5000 tasks and by 35.79% compared to AIW-PSO for 10000 tasks. These experimental results indicate that the proposed hybrid algorithm can be an effective, adaptive solution for task allocation in fog-inspired computational scheduling scenarios. This evaluation focuses on computation-side task scheduling using a synthetic task-VM model and keeping network-level factors such as latency or bandwidth idle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.