Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102054›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Women's Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS): Development and psychometric assessment of a face-to-face survey module.

Kathryn M Yount, Agnes Quisumbing, Ruth Meinzen-Dick, Hazel Malapit, Md Zahidul Hassan, Shelton S E Kanyanda, Sudhindra Sharma, Md Imrul Hassan, Jessica Heckert, Flor Paz and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Kathryn M YountRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1917-1574
Agnes QuisumbingInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5429-1857
Ruth Meinzen-DickInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Hazel MalapitInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7394-8797
Md Zahidul HassanData Analysis and Technical Assistance (DATA), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Shelton S E KanyandaNational Statistical Office of Malawi, Zomba, Malawi.
Sudhindra SharmaInterdisciplinary Analysts, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Md Imrul HassanData Analysis and Technical Assistance (DATA), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jessica HeckertInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Flor PazInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Pankaj PokhrelInterdisciplinary Analysts, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Wilbert D VundruWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-513X
Cheryl DossDepartment of Economics, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Greg SeymourInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2213-0450
Heather MoylanWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Talip KilicWorld Bank, Washington, D.C., United States of America.
Emily MyersInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5232-1848
Simone FaasInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America.
Yuk Fai CheongDepartment of Psychology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Sheela S SinharoyRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3077-3824

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data to monitor progress towards gender-related Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) remain limited. A comprehensive, concise set of metrics is needed for routine national data collection to monitor progress toward these goals. Our team developed and tested the Women's Empowerment Metric for National Statistical Systems (WEMNS) survey module for use by national statistical offices and survey organizations in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to measure women's and men's empowerment. This paper summarizes the process of developing the WEMNS module and presents detailed results of a psychometric assessment of face-to-face surveys in Bangladesh, Malawi, and Nepal. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in the pooled sample confirmed that most of the 13 item sets had adequately identified factor structures aligned with specific empowerment constructs and gender-related SDGs. In multi-group CFA assessing measurement equivalence of item sets across gender and countries, configural invariance was observed for 9 of 13 item sets across genders and across country settings. At least partial scalar invariance was observed for one item set across genders and no item sets across country settings. Spearman pairwise correlations among WEMNS factor scores derived from final CFA models showed weak associations, suggesting item sets were weakly related and distinct. Overall, Spearman pairwise correlations of 13 WEMNS-derived factor scores with external measures for basic needs, resources, agency, and subjective well-being were weak, but five moderately high correlations were conceptually aligned. In sum, the WEMNS measures require refinement and further psychometric assessment to confirm their use to make valid comparisons of empowerment across country settings and gender.

Indexed as

EmpowermentPsychometricsAdultBangladeshFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMalawiMaleNepalSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID42102054
PMCPMC13155635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.