ArticlePloS one2026
Comparative metabolic profiling, enzyme inhibitory activities, and in-silico analysis of the hexane extract and the hydrodistilled oil of Boswellia serrata.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Frankincense (Boswellia spp.) oleogum resin is a valuable natural source of bioactive phytoconstituents with diverse therapeutic potential. In this study, the hydrodistilled essential oil (EO) and n-hexane extract (HE) of Boswellia serrata gums were analyzed through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) to determine their phytochemical composition. The GC-MS results in the identification of 62 and 71 components in the EO and HE, respectively. Acetic acid octyl ester (41.09%) and nerolidol (13.64%), were the major components of the EO. Meanwhile, incensole (28.56%), (1S,2E,4S,5R,7E,11E)-cembra-2,7,11-trien-4,5-diol (13.54%), and 24-norursa-3,12-diene (9.25%) in the HE. Regarding the antioxidant effects, the EO exhibited significantly higher antioxidant capacity compared to the HE (DPPH: 9.24 and 6.50 mg TE/g; ABTS: 25.71 and 4.94 mg TE/g), respectively. Moreover, the EO was more potent in the CUPRAC test (61.12 mg TE/g for the essential oil and 50.62 mg TE/g for HE), while the n-hexane extract (72.68 mg TE/g) showed stronger ability than the EO (13.22 mg TE/g) in the FRAP assay. The EO had a higher ability in phosphomolybdenum and metal chelation tests in comparison with the HE extracts. Further, the oil showed more potent inhibitory activity against cholinesterase, α-glucosidase, and tyrosinase than the HE extract. The HE extract was only more active on α-amylase compared to the oil. These findings suggest that olibanum EO possesses potent bioactive compounds that may contribute to the management of oxidative stress and age-related conditions, including Alzheimer's disease, diabetes mellitus, and skin hyperpigmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.