Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42102029›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Hybrid text mining models for investigative keyword expansion on child sexual abuse in the dark web.

Jin Gyeong Kim, Jiyeon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin Gyeong KimDepartment of Computer and Information Engineering, Graduate School, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.
Jiyeon KimDepartment of Computer Engineering, Daegu University, Gyeongsan, South Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4697-8058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The distribution of child sexual abuse materials (CSAM) via the dark web continues to hinder digital investigations due to the network's inherent anonymity and fragmentation. This work presents a comparative analysis of text mining techniques for extracting investigative keywords from CSAM-related content on the dark web and aims to establish a foundation for scalable, expandable keyword-based detection. Using a custom crawler, we collected data from 2,414 dark web pages indexed by the Torch search engine. Based on this dataset, three methods-TF-IDF, Eigenvector Centrality, and Word2Vec-were applied to extract CSAM-related keywords, and their effectiveness was evaluated through dark web search experiments measuring the retrieval performance of CSAM-related sites. Among the individual techniques, Eigenvector Centrality-a graph-based keyword ranking algorithm-showed the highest precision and contextual relevance by identifying structurally central terms within co-occurrence networks. Building on this, we developed hybrid models that combined Eigenvector Centrality with either TF-IDF or Word2Vec. In particular, the model integrating Eigenvector Centrality with Word2Vec-based semantic similarity proved most effective in expanding investigative clues and retrieving highly relevant keywords. Based on empirically collected and domain-specific dark web data, this work differs from prior studies by empirically demonstrating a multi-method approach that not only improves keyword accuracy but also enables the dynamic expansion of early-stage crime indicators. The proposed methodology offers practical value for automating the detection of illicit content and improving the operational efficiency of cyber investigations.

Indexed as

Child Abuse, SexualData MiningInternetAlgorithmsChildHumansSearch Engine

Identifiers

PMID42102029
PMCPMC13155627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.