ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Evolution of species' range and niche in changing environments.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of species' range and niche in changing environments.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Rangewide responses of Mimulus cardinalis to an extreme heat event.American journal of botany · 2026Article
- Mutational load and adaptive variation are shaped by climate and species range dynamics in Vitis arizonica.The New phytologist · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
What causes species' niche and range margins to shift is not only a fundamental theoretical question, but also directly affects how we assess the resilience of natural populations in current and future environments. Yet despite the urgent need for theory that can predict evolutionary and ecological responses in times of accelerated climate change, the assumptions of current eco-evolutionary theory remain restrictive, with predictions neglecting important interactions between ecological and evolutionary forces. In this study, I provide quantitative, testable predictions on limits to adaptation in changing environments, which arise from the feedback between selection, genetic drift, and population dynamics. This eco-evolutionary feedback creates a tipping point beyond which adaptation fails as genetic drift overwhelms selection, and species' ranges contract from the margins or fragment abruptly-even under gradual environmental change. This "expansion threshold" is determined by three parameters: two quantifying the effects of spatial and temporal variability on the fitness of the population and one capturing the impact of genetic drift: the reduction of local genetic diversity across generations in finite populations. Genetic drift is strong in populations with small "neighborhood size." Increasing dispersal, such as via assisted migration, enlarges neighborhood size, counteracting the loss of genetic variation due to genetic drift. This increases adaptive potential and can facilitate evolutionary rescue in changing environments. Conversely, beyond the expansion threshold, local genetic variance becomes depleted, increasing extinction probability. The theory provides general predictions for species' range and niche dynamics beyond standard ecological niche models, highlighting the fundamental impact of eco-evolutionary interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.