ArticleFEMS microbiology ecology2026
Unraveling underlying mechanisms and responsible microbes of organic residue-stimulated atmospheric methane uptake in agricultural soils.
Article in FEMS microbiology ecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It has been reported that compost amendment improves atmospheric CH4 uptake of agricultural soils. However, microbes involved as well as the underlying mechanisms responsible for the observed effect remain unclear. Here we identified active methane-oxidizing bacteria (MOB) at (circum-) atmospheric CH4 concentrations in agricultural soils amended with green compost, and investigated three complementary hypotheses: (i) atmospheric CH4 consumption is driven by highly activated, flush-feeding MOB; (ii) stimulation of internal CH4 production which fuels flush-feeding methanotrophic activity; and (iii) increased availability of H2 that can serve as additional energy source for mixotrophic methanotrophy. First, we showed that MOB previously activated by exposure to high CH4 concentrations can subsequently oxidize atmospheric CH4 via the flush-feeding lifestyle. Second, no internal CH4 production in soil was observed following compost amendment, likely due to lack of suitable substrates for methanogenesis. Third, provision of elevated H2 concentrations did not affect the concurrent atmospheric CH4 oxidation. Phospholipid fatty acid-stable isotope probing revealed that four distinct MOB groups were active at (circum-) atmospheric CH4 concentrations in agricultural soils and green compost: Methylocaldum sp., Methylosinus sporium, Methylocystis sp./Methylosinus trichosporium, and USCα. These findings enhance our understanding of methanotroph ecology and can be used to craft more effective strategies of creating "climate-smart" soils.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.