ArticleIntegrative and comparative biology2026
Activity Responses of Rana forreri and Rhinella horribilis Tadpoles to Predation Cues.
Article in Integrative and comparative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tadpoles must rapidly detect and respond to predation cues to survive the most vulnerable stage of anuran development. Although previous studies have examined the effects of visual or chemical cues on tadpole behavior, none have compared the effects of multiple predator-associated sensory stimuli across species. Here, we examined the responses of two neotropical tadpole species, the Forrer's leopard frog Rana forreri (non-toxic), and the cane toad Rhinella horribilis (toxic), to visual, chemical, and auditory predation cues. Tadpoles were exposed to simulated bird shadows (visual cue), belostomatid-conditioned water (chemical cue), and calls of the Green Kingfisher predator, Chloroceryle americana (auditory cue). We recorded tadpole activity for 4 min prior to, 1 min during, and 4 min following treatment exposure using portable locomotion activity monitors (pLAMs). Rana forreri exhibited increased activity in response to auditory cues, whereas chemical and visual cues did not produce significant changes in activity levels relative to the control. Conversely, R. horribilis showed no significant differences in activity level across treatments. These findings suggest that antipredation responses vary in their sensitivity to sensory modality and may be shaped by species-specific defensive strategies. In particular, chemical defense may reduce reliance on immediate behavioral responses, while non-toxic species may exhibit stronger responsiveness to specific sensory cues. Together, our results highlight the selective prioritization of sensory information in shaping antipredation behavior in larval anurans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.