ArticleJAMA health forum2026
Private Equity Acquisition in Primary Care and Avoidable Hospitalizations.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Private equity (PE) is one form of corporate investment that has rapidly expanded into primary care, with more than 2400 primary care physicians becoming PE-affiliated since 2019. There are concerns that profit incentives associated with PE investment might be detrimental to care quality and patient outcomes. Objective: To examine changes in patient outcomes for the traditional Medicare (TM) population after primary care practices are acquired by PE firms and to identify any changes in patient composition. Design, Setting, and Participants: This economic evaluation used a stacked difference-in-differences analysis with a 20% Medicare Part B sample from 2016 to 2022. Medicare beneficiaries with PE-acquired primary care physicians were matched to control patients based on age, risk score, sex, race and ethnicity, state of residence, and dual-eligibility status. Statistical analysis was performed from November 2024 to February 2026. Exposure: Primary care practice acquisition by a PE firm, identified using PitchBook data. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes at the patient-quarter level include number of all-cause hospitalizations, number of potentially avoidable hospitalizations for ambulatory-sensitive conditions, and number of emergency department (ED) visits. Secondary outcomes include measures of patient composition, including patient age, sex, race and ethnicity, and hierarchical condition category score. Results: The analysis included 24 397 beneficiaries with PE-acquired primary care physicians, matched to 121 939 control patients. The mean (SD) age was 74 (10) years, and 56% of patients were female. After PE acquisition, the number of all-cause ED visits decreased by 1.36% (95% CI, -2.72% to -0.14%) per patient-quarter relative to baseline. Considering various sensitivity tests, there were no significant changes to the probability of or number of potentially preventable hospitalizations or all-cause hospitalizations. Patient composition remained unchanged. Conclusions and Relevance: In this national study of traditional Medicare beneficiaries, PE acquisitions of primary care practices were not associated with meaningful short-term changes in acute care outcomes. Overall, findings contribute to policy discourse on understanding the role of PE investments in shaping care quality, suggesting heterogeneity in outcomes across health care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.