Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101853›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2026

Promises, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward for the Pediatric Research Equity Act.

Alexa Pagano, Danielle J Green, Jennifer L Goldman, Anjali Deshmukh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. "Reading level is just one component": best practices for cognitive debriefing patient-reported outcome instruments with pediatric populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alexa PaganoDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Danielle J GreenDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jennifer L GoldmanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Mercy Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri.
Anjali DeshmukhSeton Hall University School of Law, Newark, New Jersey.

Funding

National Career Development Program for Researchers in Pediatric Clinical PharmacologyK12HD113189 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DANIEL K. BENJAMIN, Daniel Gonzalez · 2023 to 2026
$1.2M
Anakinra Dosing in Children with Sepsis Induced MODS: A Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic-Pharmacodynamic ApproachK23HD115855 · NICHD · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Danielle Green · 2025 to 2026
$335k
NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD113189NICHD NIH HHS K23 HD115855
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Since its enactment in 2003, the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) has significantly increased the number of pediatric drug studies performed and expanded pediatric drug labeling. Despite these advancements, many drugs used in children still lack pediatric-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, even when pediatric studies are required by law. Recent legislative changes strengthened the FDA's enforcement authority over PREA. As these changes are implemented, persistent gaps in pediatric drug development warrant examination. Addressing these gaps may help ensure that children are systematically included in clinical research and that medications used in children are supported by rigorous evidence on safety, dosing, and efficacy. Observations: Legislation to ensure pediatric drug safety and efficacy has a long history, yet pediatric-specific labeling frequently lags behind initial drug approval, with many studies required under PREA remaining incomplete for years after initial FDA approval. Consequently, off-label prescribing can be necessary for pediatric health care, leaving children exposed to medications lacking adequate pediatric evidence. Barriers to the timely completion of clinical trials are often attributed to challenges inherent to smaller, disease-specific pediatric populations; however, the FDA's limited enforcement authority and insufficient resources to address delayed pediatric trial completion play an underappreciated role. In addition, limited ability to track required studies and insufficient public transparency undermine the regulatory goals intended to protect children. With new legislative authority strengthening enforcement of PREA, understanding these barriers is essential to ensure this authority is effectively deployed to improve children's health. Conclusions and Relevance: To ensure children have access to safe, effective, evidence-based medications, effective policy changes are necessary. The FDA should use its new authority to ensure the timely completion of required pediatric studies and enhance public transparency by improving mechanisms to track PREA-mandated research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDrug LabelingPediatricsChildDiversity, Equity, InclusionDrug ApprovalHumansOff-Label UseUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug Administration

Identifiers

PMID42101853
PMCPMC13292868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.