ArticleJAMA health forum2026
Promises, Pitfalls, and Paths Forward for the Pediatric Research Equity Act.
Article in JAMA health forum, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stewardship Challenges, PK/PD Evidence, and Prescribing Appropriateness for Recently Approved Antibiotics in Pediatric Practice.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- "Reading level is just one component": best practices for cognitive debriefing patient-reported outcome instruments with pediatric populations.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Since its enactment in 2003, the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) has significantly increased the number of pediatric drug studies performed and expanded pediatric drug labeling. Despite these advancements, many drugs used in children still lack pediatric-specific US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) labeling, even when pediatric studies are required by law. Recent legislative changes strengthened the FDA's enforcement authority over PREA. As these changes are implemented, persistent gaps in pediatric drug development warrant examination. Addressing these gaps may help ensure that children are systematically included in clinical research and that medications used in children are supported by rigorous evidence on safety, dosing, and efficacy. Observations: Legislation to ensure pediatric drug safety and efficacy has a long history, yet pediatric-specific labeling frequently lags behind initial drug approval, with many studies required under PREA remaining incomplete for years after initial FDA approval. Consequently, off-label prescribing can be necessary for pediatric health care, leaving children exposed to medications lacking adequate pediatric evidence. Barriers to the timely completion of clinical trials are often attributed to challenges inherent to smaller, disease-specific pediatric populations; however, the FDA's limited enforcement authority and insufficient resources to address delayed pediatric trial completion play an underappreciated role. In addition, limited ability to track required studies and insufficient public transparency undermine the regulatory goals intended to protect children. With new legislative authority strengthening enforcement of PREA, understanding these barriers is essential to ensure this authority is effectively deployed to improve children's health. Conclusions and Relevance: To ensure children have access to safe, effective, evidence-based medications, effective policy changes are necessary. The FDA should use its new authority to ensure the timely completion of required pediatric studies and enhance public transparency by improving mechanisms to track PREA-mandated research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.