Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101836›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

Edible Cannabis and Pain, Sleep, and Mental Health Management in Older Adults.

Rebecca K Delaney, Melissa H Watt, Madeline Stanger, Isabelle Hong, Nehal K Bakshi, Angela Fagerlin, Angela Bryan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rebecca K DelaneyUniversity of Utah Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City.
Melissa H WattUniversity of Utah Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City.
Madeline StangerDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder.
Isabelle HongUniversity of Utah Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City.
Nehal K BakshiUniversity of Utah Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City.
Angela FagerlinUniversity of Utah Intermountain Health Department of Population Health Sciences, Salt Lake City.
Angela BryanDepartment of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Older adults are the fastest-growing group of cannabis consumers in the US, seeking relief from age-related ailments (eg, pain or difficulty sleeping) and improved quality of life. However, little is known about the motivations and factors that influence their use of edible cannabis and product choice. Objectives: To explore the motivations of older adults in Colorado purchasing edible cannabis products to improve sleep, pain, or mental health concerns, and to understand how they perceive the benefits and drawbacks of different cannabinoid profiles: cannabidiol (CBD)-dominant, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC)-dominant, or a THC-CBD combination product. Design, Setting, and Participants: This community-based, qualitative study was study conducted in Colorado from November 2021 to November 2023 as part of a larger clinical trial. Individual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed. Participants were a convenience sample of adults aged 60 years or older who were interested in using edible cannabis for sleep, pain, or mental health symptoms. Participants completed an in-person interview prior to purchasing 1 of 3 edible product types. Exposure: Use of edible cannabis products. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were self-reported motivations for cannabis use and perceived benefits and drawbacks of different cannabinoid profiles, assessed through semistructured interviews conducted before product purchase. Results: Among 169 participants (mean [SD] age, 70.8 [5.8] years, 89 female [54%]), 96 (57.5%) selected a THC and CBD combination product, 48 (28.7%) selected a CBD-dominant product, and 23 (13.8%) selected a THC-dominant product. Primary motivations for cannabis use included avoiding pharmaceuticals, exhausting other options, new or increasing problems, and evidence or claims of benefits. Evidence or claims of associated outcomes were seen as a benefit for all 3 product types. The most common drawback for THC and combination products was concern about getting high or being impaired, while limited efficacy was the most common drawback for CBD products. Combination products were perceived to offer dual benefits of THC-CBD, yet determining the ideal ratio was seen as a challenge. Conclusions and Relevance: In this qualitative study, older adults were motivated to use cannabis as an alternative approach to address health concerns. These findings highlight the importance of physician awareness of older adults' motivations and concerns to support informed counseling and resources.

Indexed as

CannabisPainPain ManagementSleepAgedCannabidiolColoradoDronabinolFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchCannabidiolDronabinol

Identifiers

PMID42101836
PMCPMC13156787

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.