SynthesisInternational health2026
Neglected tropical diseases in conflict-related humanitarian emergency settings: a systematic review of the literature.
Synthesis in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Neglected tropical diseases in conflict zones: devastating consequences of a lack of inclusion.International health · 2026Article
- Challenges, barriers and opportunities for neglected tropical disease programs of conflict-affected African countries.International health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) are a group of 21 conditions affecting an estimated 1 billion people worldwide, causing significant mortality and morbidity. WHO has targeted their control, elimination or eradication by 2030, while highlighting that conflict and humanitarian emergencies are risks to achieving this. A systematic review of peer-reviewed literature was undertaken, using terms related to conflict-related humanitarian emergencies (CRHE), based on the Armed Conflict Location & Event Data Project codebook terms for defining emergencies and terms including all WHO-defined NTDs. After a two-stage screening process, 26 papers were included. Common challenges for NTD programmes in CRHE were healthcare access, infrastructure, population movement and data quality. Multisectoral collaboration between actors in conflict-settings was offered as a learning for NTD programmes, along with community participation and decentralisation. Evidence gaps were identified in the knowledge base for certain NTDs and in high-quality evidence for interventions in CRHE. Collaboration is a key area for focused improvement for NTD programmes in CRHE. This should be across sectors and extend to research and analysis approaches, to ensure the most effective interventions are identified and implemented and that NTD road map targets can be achieved.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.