ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
A practical method for measuring rotation angles in partial-angle CT scan by using CTDI phantoms, metal rods, and a real-time dosimeter.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uncertainty-aware deep learning in FDG-PET: implications for generalizability in clinical practice.Radiological physics and technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Partial-angle computed tomography (CT), including CT fluoroscopy and C-arm cone-beam CT systems, plays an important role in image-guided interventions. In these systems, the X-ray tube rotation angle is a critical factor affecting the dose evaluation. However, scans are often performed with partial rotations of approximately 180°-240°, and reliable methods for measuring the actual rotation angle have not been established. In this study, we propose a method for measuring the rotation angle in partial-angle CT scans and improving dose evaluation accuracy by incorporating the measured angles into Monte Carlo simulations. Measurements were performed using CT fluoroscopy and angiography. A CT dose index phantom was placed on the patient table, and metal rods and a real-time dosimeter were inserted into the peripheral holes and center hole, respectively. The rotation angles were identified from the X-ray attenuation caused by the metal rods, and the dose profiles for a single scan were determined by combining measurements acquired with and without the rods. The measured rotation angles and dose profiles were incorporated into Monte Carlo simulations and then validated against measured values. The differences between the displayed and measured rotation angles were 3.4% for CT fluoroscopy and 8.1% for angiography. Compared with the conventional method, the maximum discrepancy in dose evaluation was reduced by 9.0% for CT fluoroscopy and 4.8% for angiography. The proposed method facilitates rotation angle quality assurance in partial-angle CT scans and contributes to appropriate dose management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42101795What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.