ArticleBioresources and bioprocessing2026
Production of volatile fatty acids through microbial conversion of waste sludges: influence of substrates.
Article in Bioresources and bioprocessing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Inadequate sludge treatment poses a significant risk of environmental pollution. To reduce pollution, utilizing waste sludge as an energy source offers a sustainable solution to mitigate pollution. Since sludges contain abundant organics, they are expected to produce more valuable organics, such as volatile fatty acids (VFAs). Although sludge fermentation has been widely studied, direct yields of VFA production from different sludge types are still limited, particularly for sludge materials originating from Finnish wastewater treatment plants. In this study, laboratory-scale bioreactors were built to examine VFA production from digester feed sludge, digested sludge, and ammonia removal sludge, which were collected from local wastewater treatment plants. Among the tested substrates, digested feed sludge resulted in the highest VFA yield, reaching 171.6 ± 6.3 mg/g volatile solids after 11 days of incubation, which indicated its superior potential for VFA generation. In contrast, bioreactors fed with digested sludge or ammonia removal sludge showed no clear increasing trend in VFA production. The addition of sawdust led to lower overall VFA yields, approximately half of those obtained with digested feed sludge alone, and increasing the sludge proportion did not result in further yield enhancement. Acetic acid was the dominant VFA in all bioreactors, accounting for 61.2-97.9% of total VFAs. Microbial community analysis indicated the prevalence of phyla Bacillota and Pseudomonadota, with Lactobacillus being relatively abundant in bioreactors exhibiting higher VFA production. These findings suggest that sludge type plays an important role in determining VFA production performance and may support more informed selection of sludge substrates for VFA-oriented sludge valorisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.