Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101766›Full record

ArticlePsicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS2026

Loneliness, affectivity and psychological distress in people living alone during the COVID-19 pandemic: a cluster analysis.

Kleber Roberto da Silva Gonçalves de Oliveira, Fabio Alexis Rincón Uribe, Edson Júnior Silva da Cruz, Janari da Silva Pedroso

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psicologia, reflexao e critica : revista semestral do Departamento de Psicologia da UFRGS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kleber Roberto da Silva Gonçalves de OliveiraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6371-3006
Fabio Alexis Rincón UribePrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil. faru1095@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9764-2429
Edson Júnior Silva da CruzPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1884-3172
Janari da Silva PedrosoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Psicologia and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Teoria e Pesquisa do Comportamento, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7602-834X

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorNorsk Hydro Norsk HydroPró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Universidade Federal do Pará Pró-Reitoria de Pesquisa e Pós-Graduação, Universidade Federal do Pará
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, rates of loneliness increased significantly due to the challenging and adverse context arising from this global health emergency.

objectiveTo classify adults living alone according to perceived loneliness and affectivity and to examine their association with symptoms of psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic.

methodThe design of this study was cross-sectional, descriptive and correlational. The sample consisted of 418 adults living alone, recruited through a non-probabilistic snowball sampling procedure using an online survey distributed via social media and email. To analyze the data, a cluster analysis was applied using the k-means method, the chi-squared test and the Odds Ratio statistic.

resultsTwo homogeneous groups were identified: Group 1 (n = 233) characterized by high levels of perceived loneliness, low levels of positive affect and high levels of negative affect; Group 2 (n = 185) showed low levels of perceived loneliness, high levels of positive affect and low levels of negative affect. Cluster 1 was more likely to have symptoms of psychological distress than cluster 2.

conclusionsTo summarize, loneliness among individuals who reside alone can have an impact on the likelihood of experiencing psychological distress and adverse effects.

Indexed as

COVID-19LonelinessNegative affectPandemicPositive affectSocial isolation

Identifiers

PMID42101766
PMCPMC13323415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.