ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
A Guide to Constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces for Prevention Science Research.
Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Introduction to the Special Issue on Transforming Prevention Science: Advances and Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Related Methods.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026Article
- Reclaiming Data, Restoring Health: The Indigenous Biomedical Data Science Renaissance.Annual review of biomedical data science · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered computational methods, such as machine learning and natural language processing, are increasingly applied in deaths of despair research among Indigenous populations. However, their application in Indigenous contexts is often constrained by epistemological misalignment, technical limitations, and ethical concerns. Integrating Indigenous Research Methodologies into AI-powered prevention science research is necessary to support Indigenous Data Sovereignty and address deaths of despair. The Indigenous Computational Approach (ICA) provides a structured reflexive protocol for constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces that operationalize Indigenous Research Methodologies within computational workflows. ICA aligns four interdependent components: Researcher Standpoint, Indigenous Theoretical Frameworks, AI Data Analysis Technique, and Dissemination and Indigenous Governance. This protocol is supported by operational steps and an accompanying ICA Checklist. A previously published case study on the Indigenous Wholistic Factors Project illustrates the ICA in practice in the context of suicide risk modeling. The case study applied a lasso logistic regression model to structure feature selection on an Indigenous subsample of the 2019-2020 California Healthy Kids Survey (n = 2609). Ten of 17 candidate features were retained, and the model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC = 0.87) and acceptable calibration (Brier score = 0.10). The ICA does not guarantee different empirical findings or superior model accuracy, but rather it restructures how AI models are designed, validated, and deployed for prevention science research. The ICA provides a replicable protocol for AI-powered prevention science research to support Indigenous self-determination and community-defined well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.