Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101761›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026

A Guide to Constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces for Prevention Science Research.

Valentín Quiroz de la Sierra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Valentín Quiroz de la SierraCenter for Indigenous Health, Department of International Health, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, 415 N. Washington St., Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA. vsierra4@jh.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9035-8094

Funding

NATIVE RISE-Risk Identification for Suicide and Enhanced care for Native AmericansR01MH128518 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Emily Haroz · 2023 to 2026
$2.4M
Computational Social Science Training ProgramT32HD101364 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI Jennifer Ahern, PATRICK T BRADSHAW · 2020 to 2026
$1.7M
Preparing Indigenous Scientists to Lead Innovative Substance Use Research: The Native Children's Research Exchange Scholars ProgramR25DA061492 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Jerreed Dean Ivanich, Michelle C Sarche · 2024 to 2026
$804k
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development 5T32HD101364National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences 5R01MH128518-03NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD101364NIDA NIH HHS 1R25DA061492NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA061492NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH128518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered computational methods, such as machine learning and natural language processing, are increasingly applied in deaths of despair research among Indigenous populations. However, their application in Indigenous contexts is often constrained by epistemological misalignment, technical limitations, and ethical concerns. Integrating Indigenous Research Methodologies into AI-powered prevention science research is necessary to support Indigenous Data Sovereignty and address deaths of despair. The Indigenous Computational Approach (ICA) provides a structured reflexive protocol for constructing Indigenous Statistical Spaces that operationalize Indigenous Research Methodologies within computational workflows. ICA aligns four interdependent components: Researcher Standpoint, Indigenous Theoretical Frameworks, AI Data Analysis Technique, and Dissemination and Indigenous Governance. This protocol is supported by operational steps and an accompanying ICA Checklist. A previously published case study on the Indigenous Wholistic Factors Project illustrates the ICA in practice in the context of suicide risk modeling. The case study applied a lasso logistic regression model to structure feature selection on an Indigenous subsample of the 2019-2020 California Healthy Kids Survey (n = 2609). Ten of 17 candidate features were retained, and the model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC = 0.87) and acceptable calibration (Brier score = 0.10). The ICA does not guarantee different empirical findings or superior model accuracy, but rather it restructures how AI models are designed, validated, and deployed for prevention science research. The ICA provides a replicable protocol for AI-powered prevention science research to support Indigenous self-determination and community-defined well-being.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePrimary PreventionCaliforniaHumansArtificial intelligenceDeaths of despairIndigenous Data SovereigntyIndigenous Research MethodologiesPrevention science

Identifiers

PMID42101761
PMCPMC13189265

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.