Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101664›Full record

ReviewHuman genetics2026

Bringing environment back into human evolution: why human genetics needs genome-environment association studies.

Pei-Wei Sun

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Human genetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Pei-Wei SunDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA. pei-wei.sun@yale.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4130-310X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the genetic basis of human adaptation to environmental pressures is a central question in evolutionary biology. Recent advancements in genome-environment association (GEA) methods have provided novel insights into how genetic variation is shaped by climate, diet, altitude, pathogens, and other environmental factors. However, despite significant progress in non-human studies, the application of GEA in human populations remains underused. This article synthesizes recent GEA methodological advancements, including redundancy analysis (RDA) and machine learning approaches, such as gradient forest (GF), to improve the detection of selection signals while accounting for demographic noise. Furthermore, I discuss the implications of historical GEA projection and genetic offset to human adaptation, particularly in the context of rapid urbanization and climate change. By integrating genomic, environmental, and epidemiological data, GEA has the potential not only to enhance our understanding of past human evolution but also to evaluate how allele-environment relationships may shift under future environmental change. By refining statistical models and expanding studies to diverse populations, GEA can play a critical role in elucidating the mechanisms underlying human adaptation and characterizing how selective forces shape the spatial distribution of adaptive alleles.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionEvolution, MolecularGene-Environment InteractionGenome, HumanGenome-Wide Association StudyAdaptation, BiologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalEnvironmentGenetic VariationHumansSelection, Genetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.