Observational studyOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2026
Impact of oral glucocorticoids on the effectiveness of romosozumab: the multicenter OASIS cohort study.
Observational study in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Author response to the letter to the editor regarding "Hip Response to Romosozumab in Glucocorticoid Users: Beyond Systemic Bone Turnover Markers".Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- Hip response to romosozumab in glucocorticoid users: beyond systemic bone turnover markers.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This multicenter retrospective cohort compared romosozumab outcomes between oral glucocorticoid users and non-users. Bone turnover marker responses and lumbar spine bone mineral density gains were similar, whereas total hip bone mineral density gains were smaller among glucocorticoid users. PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of oral glucocorticoids (GC) on the effectiveness of romosozumab by comparing outcomes between GC users and non-users after adjusting for patient background.
methodsThis multicenter, retrospective cohort study analyzed patients who completed 12 months of therapy (n = 428). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was employed to construct a pseudo-population with balanced baseline characteristics, yielding 40 GC users and 39.8 non-users (95.3% female, mean age 76.6 years; mean lumbar spine T-score -2.7; mean GC dose 5.4 mg/day [prednisolone equivalent]). Percentage changes in bone turnover markers (BTMs) and bone mineral density (BMD) over 12 months were compared between groups. Factors affecting BMD changes were identified using multivariable analysis.
resultsGC use did not significantly affect the changes in PINP and TRACP-5b levels. The 12-month increase in lumbar spine BMD was comparable between groups (GC users 9.7% vs. non-users 10.7%; P = 0.55). In contrast, the increase in total hip BMD was significantly lower in GC users compared with non-users (2.8% vs. 5.6%; P = 0.003). Multivariable analysis revealed that baseline PINP was significantly associated with the BMD increase at the lumbar spine, whereas daily GC dose was a significant factor for the total hip.
conclusionOral GC use did not significantly affect changes in BTMs or BMD increases at the lumbar spine. Smaller gains in total hip BMD were observed in GC users, which may have reflected not only GC use but also underlying disease-related factors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.