ArticleSkeletal radiology2026
Comparison of radiomics-based models for detection of Modic type 1 changes in photon-counting detector CT images of the lumbar spine.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo compare diagnostic performance of four radiomics-based machine learning models for detecting Modic type 1-changes of the lumbar spine in photon-counting detector (PCD)-CT images, using MRI as the reference standard. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this retrospective single-center study, 60 patients who underwent lumbar spine PCD-CT and MRI within a one-week interval showing Modic type 1-changes were analyzed. A total of 105 radiomic features were extracted from 360 segmented vertebrae, of which 348 were included in the final analysis after quality control. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and support vector machines (SVM) were trained and evaluated using nested cross-validation. Discriminatory performance of the models was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). AUC values were compared using the DeLong Test with Benjamini-Hochberg correction to adjust for multiple testing. Diagnostic accuracy was assessed by calculating sensitivity, specificity and F1-score for each model.
resultsLASSO achieved the highest AUC (0.842, 95% CI 0.793-0.891), pairwise comparisons did not show significant differences across the models (p ≥ 0.337). Sensitivity was highest for LASSO (0.756, 95% CI 0.662-0.846), whereas specificity was highest for SVM (0.929, 95% CI 0.896-0.958). The highest F1-score was observed for LASSO (0.605, 95% CI 0.521-0.679).
conclusionFour radiomics-based machine learning models demonstrated similar high discriminatory performance but differing diagnostic accuracy for detecting Modic type 1-changes on PCD-CT images. These results support the feasibility of radiomics for evaluation of pathologies beyond visual inspection, although further validation is required to determine clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.