Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42101619›Full record

ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026

Capacitive heating devices for therapeutic hyperthermia: a review of essential physical characteristics and challenges.

H P Kok, T Ohguri, F Navarro, U S Gaipl, C A Minnaar, J Contreras, P Ghadjar, J Crezee, K Kuroda

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

H P KokAmsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. H.P.Kok@amsterdamumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8504-136X
T OhguriDepartment of Therapeutic Radiology, University Hospital of Occupational and Environmental Health, Kitakyushu, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9961-6360
F NavarroDepartment of Medical Physics, Regional University Hospital of Málaga, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9382-5524
U S GaiplTranslational Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6375-5476
C A MinnaarDepartment of Radiation Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, 2193, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3692-7134
J ContrerasDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Regional Universitario, Málaga, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7467-0259
P GhadjarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin corporate member of Free University Berlin and Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2747-165X
J CrezeeAmsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7474-0533
K KurodaSchool of Information Science and Technology, Tokai University, Tokai, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-1464

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Therapeutic hyperthermia is typically applied using radiative or capacitive heating devices. Capacitive heating applies electrode pairs positioned on the patient to increase the tumor temperature and is considered a user-friendly method for relatively easy application of hyperthermia to both superficial and deep-seated tumor sites. However, this heating technique also has some limitations that are mainly inherent to the physics of capacitively induced heating. This review provides an overview of the principles of capacitive heating devices and the factors influencing the power absorption and resulting temperature distribution in the patient. Device parameters that strongly influence the achieved temperature distribution include the electrode sizes, the water bolus temperature for skin cooling, the cooling medium, and the output power. These parameters vary in commercially available devices. Complete characterizations of most of the commercially available capacitive devices are still lacking. Sparse phantom measurements in the literature characterizing capacitive devices indicate that therapeutic heating is at least possible for superficial tumors and tumors at intermediate depth. The dominant E‑field orientation with capacitive heating induces preferential subcutaneous fat heating, which limits deep heating and makes it most effective for slender patients (i.e., fat layer thickness < 1.5-2 cm). Numerical simulations have been helpful in optimizing device design, particularly in terms of bolus cooling, and are increasingly used for patient-specific treatment planning. Based on the physical characteristics and present literature, it can be concluded that appropriate patient selection is important to ensure effective and responsible use of capacitive heating devices.

Indexed as

CancerPhantom measurementsQuality assuranceRF heatingTreatment planning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.