ReviewStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Capacitive heating devices for therapeutic hyperthermia: a review of essential physical characteristics and challenges.
Review in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Combined re-radiation therapy and regional or capacitive hyperthermia as a part of multimodal treatment for locoregional breast cancer recurrences in previously irradiated areas.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Therapeutic hyperthermia is typically applied using radiative or capacitive heating devices. Capacitive heating applies electrode pairs positioned on the patient to increase the tumor temperature and is considered a user-friendly method for relatively easy application of hyperthermia to both superficial and deep-seated tumor sites. However, this heating technique also has some limitations that are mainly inherent to the physics of capacitively induced heating. This review provides an overview of the principles of capacitive heating devices and the factors influencing the power absorption and resulting temperature distribution in the patient. Device parameters that strongly influence the achieved temperature distribution include the electrode sizes, the water bolus temperature for skin cooling, the cooling medium, and the output power. These parameters vary in commercially available devices. Complete characterizations of most of the commercially available capacitive devices are still lacking. Sparse phantom measurements in the literature characterizing capacitive devices indicate that therapeutic heating is at least possible for superficial tumors and tumors at intermediate depth. The dominant E‑field orientation with capacitive heating induces preferential subcutaneous fat heating, which limits deep heating and makes it most effective for slender patients (i.e., fat layer thickness < 1.5-2 cm). Numerical simulations have been helpful in optimizing device design, particularly in terms of bolus cooling, and are increasingly used for patient-specific treatment planning. Based on the physical characteristics and present literature, it can be concluded that appropriate patient selection is important to ensure effective and responsible use of capacitive heating devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42101619What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.